{"id":9116,"date":"2016-09-29T16:50:00","date_gmt":"2016-09-29T14:50:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/?p=9116"},"modified":"2022-09-29T17:02:49","modified_gmt":"2022-09-29T15:02:49","slug":"actu-jurisprudence-obligatoire-de-conciliation-et-saisie-du-juge-civil-des-referes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/?p=9116","title":{"rendered":"\u00a0ACTU | JURISPRUDENCE : PREALABLE OBLIGATOIRE DE CONCILIATION ET SAISIE DU JUGE CIVIL DES REFERES"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"9116\" class=\"elementor elementor-9116\" data-elementor-post-type=\"post\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"penci-section penci-disSticky penci-structure-10 elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-3c7857a elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"3c7857a\" data-element_type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"penci-ercol-100 penci-ercol-order-1 penci-sticky-ct    elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-76e4e30\" data-id=\"76e4e30\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-2f99b3a elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"2f99b3a\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>Trente ans jour pour jour apr\u00e8s la mise en place de la proc\u00e9dure de concilia\u00adtion obligatoire devant le Comit\u00e9 national olympique et sportif fran\u00e7ais (CNOSF) par la loi Bredin du 13 juillet 1992, la Cour de cassation \u00ab f\u00eate \u00bb cet anniversaire en relativi\u00adsant la port\u00e9e de ce caract\u00e8re obligatoire. Le contentieux des assembl\u00e9es g\u00e9n\u00e9rales des f\u00e9d\u00e9rations sportives fait partie de cet \u00ab \u00eelot de r\u00e9sistance judiciaire \u00bb dans un oc\u00e9an de comp\u00e9tence administrative s\u2019agis\u00adsant des actes des f\u00e9d\u00e9rations d\u00e9l\u00e9gataires-<strong><span style=\"color: #00dc8c;\">1<\/span><\/strong>. Or, en application de l\u2019article R. 141-5 du code du sport qui dispose que \u00ab la saisine du [CNOSF] \u00e0 fin de conciliation constitue un pr\u00e9alable obligatoire \u00e0 tout recours conten\u00adtieux, lorsque le conflit r\u00e9sulte d\u2019une d\u00e9cision, susceptible ou non de recours interne, prise par une f\u00e9d\u00e9ration dans l\u2019exercice de pr\u00e9roga\u00adtives de puissance publique ou en application de ses statuts \u00bb, les d\u00e9cisions d\u2019une f\u00e9d\u00e9ration en mati\u00e8re \u00e9lectorale (recevabilit\u00e9 des candi\u00addatures, organisation mat\u00e9rielle des \u00e9lections, proclamation des r\u00e9sultats\u2026) rel\u00e8vent du pr\u00e9alable obligatoire de conciliation non pas en ce qu\u2019elles r\u00e9v\u00e8lent l\u2019utilisation de pr\u00e9ro\u00adgatives de puissance publique (conduisant \u00e0 la comp\u00e9tence administrative) mais au motif qu\u2019elles sont prises en application des statuts de la f\u00e9d\u00e9ration en cause (orientant le contentieux vers la voie judiciaire).<\/p><p>Depuis fort longtemps, le juge administratif consid\u00e8re de fa\u00e7on constante que l\u2019omission du pr\u00e9alable obligatoire de conciliation conduit \u00e0 une irrecevabilit\u00e9 du recours, alors m\u00eame que ce recours pr\u00e9alable aurait \u00e9t\u00e9 finalement introduit post\u00e9rieurement \u00e0 la saisine du juge, cette obligation \u00e9tant ainsi insusceptible d\u2019\u00eatre r\u00e9gularis\u00e9e en cours d\u2019instance-<strong><span style=\"color: #00dc8c;\">2<\/span><\/strong>.<\/p><p>Le juge judiciaire ne s\u2019\u00e9tait, pour sa part, jamais prononc\u00e9 au plus haut niveau puisque l\u2019on peine \u00e0 recenser deux ordonnances de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 devant feu le TGI \u2013 au demeurant assez anciennes-<strong><span style=\"color: #00dc8c;\">3<\/span><\/strong> \u2013 ayant consid\u00e9r\u00e9 que l\u2019omis\u00adsion du pr\u00e9alable de conciliation devant le CNOSF constituait \u00ab une irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 sanc\u00adtionn\u00e9e par une fin de non-recevoir \u00bb.<\/p><p>Or, saisie d\u2019un pourvoi form\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019encontre d\u2019un arr\u00eat de la cour d\u2019appel de Lyon du 28 avril 2021 (no 20\/03725) confirmant une ordon\u00adnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon du 1er juillet 2020 (no 20\/00827), la Cour de cassation vient d\u2019adopter une position qui fait pr\u00e9valoir la voie du contentieux sur celle du mode alternatif de r\u00e9solution des litiges.<\/p><p>Dans l\u2019affaire signal\u00e9e, qui concernait une assembl\u00e9e g\u00e9n\u00e9rale de la F\u00e9d\u00e9ration fran\u00ad\u00e7aise de taekwondo et disciplines associ\u00e9es, les requ\u00e9rants contestaient la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la convocation \u00e0 ladite assembl\u00e9e qui s\u2019est tenue fin juin 2020.<\/p><p>Ayant contest\u00e9 celle-ci au moyen d\u2019un r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 \u00ab heure \u00e0 heure \u00bb, ils s\u2019\u00e9taient vus opposer une fin de non-recevoir par le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s, confirm\u00e9e en appel, au motif qu\u2019ils avaient omis de saisir pr\u00e9alablement le CNOSF \u00e0 fin de conciliation.<\/p><p>Cette vision des choses est censur\u00e9e par la Cour pour deux motifs qui interpellent l\u2019administrativiste.<\/p><p>Tout d\u2019abord, elle pose qu\u2019\u00ab en cas de trouble manifestement illicite ou de dommage imminent, les dispositions de l\u2019ar\u00adticle R. 141-5 ne font pas obstacle \u00e0 la saisine du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s \u00bb.<\/p><p>Pr\u00e9cisons que si le juge administratif consi\u00add\u00e8re pour sa part que la voie du r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 n\u2019est pas ferm\u00e9e alors m\u00eame que la proc\u00e9dure de conciliation ne serait pas achev\u00e9e, c\u2019est \u00e0 la condition que le requ\u00e9rant justifie d\u2019avoir au moins initi\u00e9 celle-ci-<strong><span style=\"color: #00dc8c;\">4<\/span><\/strong>.<\/p><p>Puis elle consid\u00e8re que le fait de convoquer les membres d\u2019une association en vue de l\u2019assembl\u00e9e g\u00e9n\u00e9rale de la f\u00e9d\u00e9ration ne constitue pas une \u00ab d\u00e9cision \u00bb au sens de l\u2019article R. 141-5 mais \u00ab un acte pr\u00e9paratoire aux d\u00e9lib\u00e9rations de l\u2019assembl\u00e9e g\u00e9n\u00e9rale \u00bb.<\/p><p>En droit administratif, un tel acte pr\u00e9pa\u00adratoire, ne faisant par d\u00e9finition pas grief, n\u2019aurait pu faire l\u2019objet d\u2019un recours\u2026<\/p><p>Rappelons, \u00e0 toutes fins utiles, que le pr\u00e9a\u00adlable obligatoire de conciliation avait \u00e9t\u00e9 notamment mis en place en 1992 pour r\u00e9soudre facilement des litiges avant qu\u2019ils ne d\u00e9g\u00e9n\u00e8rent en \u00ab vrais \u00bb contentieux. Telle est, selon nous, une r\u00e9elle vision utili\u00adtariste des choses\u2026<\/p><ol><li><span style=\"color: #00dc8c;\">Encore que l\u2019on assiste ces derniers temps \u00e0 un cu\u00adrieux retour de balancier de la part du juge administra\u00adtif en mati\u00e8re disciplinaire (v. CAA Paris, 21 mars 2022, no 21PA00916, JS 2022, no 229, p. 8, obs. F. Lagarde).<\/span><\/li><li><span style=\"color: #00dc8c;\">CE 22 nov. 2006, n\u00b0 289839, <em>Association Squash Rouennaise<\/em>, Lebon ; AJDA 2006. 2256.<\/span><\/li><li><span style=\"color: #00dc8c;\">TGI Paris, r\u00e9f., 13 d\u00e9c. 1996, <em>Belmudez c\/ la F\u00e9d\u00e9ra\u00adtion fran\u00e7aise de rugby, <\/em>in\u00e9dit ; TGI Paris, r\u00e9f., 13 d\u00e9c. 1996, <em>Ceccon c\/ F\u00e9d\u00e9ration fran\u00e7aise de rugby<\/em>, in\u00e9dit.<\/span><\/li><li><span style=\"color: #00dc8c;\">TA Rouen, r\u00e9f., 28 d\u00e9c. 2001, <em>Chebah c\/ la F\u00e9d\u00e9ration fran\u00e7aise de boxe<\/em>, D. 2002. 2710, obs. J.-C. Breillat.<\/span><\/li><\/ol><h3>\u00a0<\/h3><h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/jean-christophe-breillat-75365311\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Jean-Christophe BREILLAT<\/a><\/h3><p><strong>[Civ. 3e, 13 juill. 2022, no 21-18.796]<\/strong><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Trente ans jour pour jour apr\u00e8s la mise en place de la proc\u00e9dure de concilia\u00adtion obligatoire devant le Comit\u00e9 national olympique et sportif fran\u00e7ais (CNOSF) par la loi Bredin du 13 juillet&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":92,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":"","beyondwords_generate_audio":"","beyondwords_project_id":"","beyondwords_content_id":"","beyondwords_preview_token":"","beyondwords_player_content":"","beyondwords_player_style":"","beyondwords_language_code":"","beyondwords_language_id":"","beyondwords_title_voice_id":"","beyondwords_body_voice_id":"","beyondwords_summary_voice_id":"","beyondwords_error_message":"","beyondwords_disabled":"","beyondwords_delete_content":"","beyondwords_podcast_id":"","beyondwords_hash":"","publish_post_to_speechkit":"","speechkit_hash":"","speechkit_generate_audio":"","speechkit_project_id":"","speechkit_podcast_id":"","speechkit_error_message":"","speechkit_disabled":"","speechkit_access_key":"","speechkit_error":"","speechkit_info":"","speechkit_response":"","speechkit_retries":"","speechkit_status":"","speechkit_updated_at":"","_speechkit_link":"","_speechkit_text":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[91,563,315,59],"class_list":["post-9116","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-classifiee","tag-actualite","tag-conciliation","tag-droit","tag-jurisport"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.3.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>\u00a0ACTU | JURISPRUDENCE : PREALABLE OBLIGATOIRE DE CONCILIATION ET SAISIE DU JUGE CIVIL DES REFERES - CDES<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/?p=9116\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u00a0ACTU | JURISPRUDENCE : PREALABLE OBLIGATOIRE DE CONCILIATION ET SAISIE DU JUGE CIVIL DES REFERES - CDES\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Trente ans jour pour jour apr\u00e8s la mise en place de la proc\u00e9dure de concilia\u00adtion obligatoire devant le Comit\u00e9 national olympique et sportif fran\u00e7ais (CNOSF) par la loi Bredin du 13 juillet&hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/?p=9116\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"CDES\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-09-29T14:50:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-09-29T15:02:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Viktoria Rosta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u00c9crit par\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Viktoria Rosta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/?p=9116\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/?p=9116\",\"name\":\"\u00a0ACTU | JURISPRUDENCE : PREALABLE OBLIGATOIRE DE CONCILIATION ET SAISIE DU JUGE CIVIL DES REFERES - CDES\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-09-29T14:50:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-09-29T15:02:49+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/#\/schema\/person\/3fd95d04f12a9edf5003ec0df19d43bc\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/?p=9116#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/?p=9116\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/?p=9116#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Accueil\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u00a0ACTU | JURISPRUDENCE : PREALABLE OBLIGATOIRE DE CONCILIATION ET SAISIE DU JUGE CIVIL DES REFERES\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/\",\"name\":\"CDES\",\"description\":\"Centre de Droit et d&#039;Economie du Sport\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/#\/schema\/person\/3fd95d04f12a9edf5003ec0df19d43bc\",\"name\":\"Viktoria Rosta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/139dff69b1764c6ee4a6645c2ecf0b8ba8c5951b492b44d8858b07f7c293c210?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/139dff69b1764c6ee4a6645c2ecf0b8ba8c5951b492b44d8858b07f7c293c210?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Viktoria Rosta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/?author=92\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u00a0ACTU | JURISPRUDENCE : PREALABLE OBLIGATOIRE DE CONCILIATION ET SAISIE DU JUGE CIVIL DES REFERES - CDES","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/?p=9116","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u00a0ACTU | JURISPRUDENCE : PREALABLE OBLIGATOIRE DE CONCILIATION ET SAISIE DU JUGE CIVIL DES REFERES - CDES","og_description":"Trente ans jour pour jour apr\u00e8s la mise en place de la proc\u00e9dure de concilia\u00adtion obligatoire devant le Comit\u00e9 national olympique et sportif fran\u00e7ais (CNOSF) par la loi Bredin du 13 juillet&hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/?p=9116","og_site_name":"CDES","article_published_time":"2016-09-29T14:50:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-09-29T15:02:49+00:00","author":"Viktoria Rosta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u00c9crit par":"Viktoria Rosta","Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/?p=9116","url":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/?p=9116","name":"\u00a0ACTU | JURISPRUDENCE : PREALABLE OBLIGATOIRE DE CONCILIATION ET SAISIE DU JUGE CIVIL DES REFERES - CDES","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-09-29T14:50:00+00:00","dateModified":"2022-09-29T15:02:49+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/#\/schema\/person\/3fd95d04f12a9edf5003ec0df19d43bc"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/?p=9116#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/cdes.fr\/?p=9116"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/?p=9116#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Accueil","item":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u00a0ACTU | JURISPRUDENCE : PREALABLE OBLIGATOIRE DE CONCILIATION ET SAISIE DU JUGE CIVIL DES REFERES"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/","name":"CDES","description":"Centre de Droit et d&#039;Economie du Sport","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/#\/schema\/person\/3fd95d04f12a9edf5003ec0df19d43bc","name":"Viktoria Rosta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/139dff69b1764c6ee4a6645c2ecf0b8ba8c5951b492b44d8858b07f7c293c210?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/139dff69b1764c6ee4a6645c2ecf0b8ba8c5951b492b44d8858b07f7c293c210?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Viktoria Rosta"},"url":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/?author=92"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9116","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/92"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9116"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9116\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9124,"href":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9116\/revisions\/9124"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9116"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9116"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cdes.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9116"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}